The Community Rating System, used by the National Flood Insurance Program, provides flood insurance discounts to communities that pass building codes and enforce regulations aimed at reducing risk.
Discounts are based on a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being the best and receiving a 45 percent discount. A 10 is the worst, resulting in no discount. A community not participating in the program is rated 10. Participation is free and voluntary.
Terrebonne currently has a 7 rating, giving residents a 15 percent discount on flood insurance. The parish has received unofficial notice from FEMA that its rating will be change to a 6 beginning in October, lowering the cost of flood insurance for residents by 20 percent, Parish Planning and Zoning Director Pat Gordon
said.
Lafourche Parish does not participate and receives no flood-insurance discounts.
FEMA inspects communities every five years to make sure they comply with National Flood Insurance Program regulations. The federal agency looks to see if buildings are properly elevated, the necessary permits were secured and all building rules followed, said Michael Hunnicutt, deputy section chief for FEMA’s hazard-mitigation office. The Community Resiliancy Program rewards parishes that go above and beyond those standards.
“It helps save money, lowers flood-insurance costs, encourages safe building, smarter construction and mitigates against future risk,” Hunnicutt said.
The lower rating is due to the parish’s work educating locals about flood-risk management, aggressively pursuing elevation grant money and performing regular maintenance of levees and drainage. The parish also tracks flood damage to properties, requiring those with repeated damage to elevate or sell and move to higher ground.
Properties bought by the parish are converted to green space so no others build on high-risk land, Gordon said.
Terrebonne Parish President Michel Claudet said his administration has worked hard to improve the parish’s rating. It was an 8 when he entered office, and it dropped to a 7 in 2009.
A unit of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., the largest US home insurer, withdrew from its NFIP partnership in June 2010, citing the program's instability. Allstate, the second-largest provider of home coverage, and Travelers still

While short lapses don't affect current policy holders, they prevent prospective buyers from closing on new homes because banks and other mortgage lenders require owners to have flood insurance. The National Flood Insurance Program's rates are
Here's something that hasn't been on the front burner for mortgage bankers & Realtors for a while: flood insurance. "The federal program that insures homes against flood damage expires next Friday and is at risk of not being renewed.
That's why anyone wanting to buy a home in an area with the potential for flooding cannot get a mortgage without first getting flood insurance. Lenders see the numbers and want to protect their investments. But at the same time, insurers won't offer
Whatever the hurdles - Goss' kids say they are determined to get their parents house back into shape. Most mortgage lenders require flood insurance for property in high risk areas. The National Flood Insurance Program operated by FEMA offers flood
Dear Editor,
This letter is in response to Mayor Mike Robertson’s letter last week.
If you have been reading this paper the last few years you would have read about the differences the Mayor and I have had over the flooding concerns in Beebe. But the Mayor is correct about what happened at the trial. The attorney for the Union Pacific Railroad spent the majority of his time attacking the homeowners and the city with his conclusion that they were the ones who caused the flooding, as if the houses had never been built then there would have been no flooding.
Mr. McKay, attorney for UPRR, stated that Roswell Beebe would be rolling over in his grave because the city was blaming the railroad , the city which was named after him would fault the railroad for the flooding. But who was Roswell Beebe? He, along with others formed a company to build a railroad from Missouri to Argenta. For their efforts the state awarded them over one million acres to build the railroad. Furthermore the citizens of Beebe never named the city after Mr. Beebe but the railroad named the fueling station for him and this station later became the city of Beebe.
The main witnesses for the UPRR were their own employees but the courtroom never heard that Union Pacific has been fined by the federal government for violating the rights of employees after they raised safety concerns, including track safety issues. These employees were fired or suspended by UPRR. The government ruled that UPRR had a problem of retaliation against workers who made safety issues of the railroad known.
One of the witnesses for the railroad claimed to be on the railroad Christmas Eve, the night of the flood, but didn’t take any pictures because for some reason the camera he had did not work. Nor did he take any measurements of the flood waters of either side of the tracks during this time but claimed he knew from which direction the flood water approached the tracks.
At no time did the railroad explain why it did not receive floodplain development permits for the work it has done to its tracks in the floodplain. All the railroad could do is to blame the city and the citizens of Beebe.